Biomedical Ethics Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Biomedical Ethics - Essay Example In most cases than not, passive euthanasia results to prolonged suffering for the patient because of cessation of pain alleviating interventions. This is in direct contravention to the foundation upon which euthanasia is laid as a principle of alleviating patient’s pain and suffering. On the other hand, active euthanasia involves the injection or administration of a substance(S) that causes the swift and painless death of the patient. This is more in line with the original intentions of allowing euthanasia to be an option in medical practice. Active euthanasia ensures that the patient does not suffer anymore as long as the decision is consensual and legal. The AMA’s postulation can be construed as an attempt to shield doctors from blame that might emerge from controversial ethical issues that result from cases where euthanasia is involved. Another explanation for AMA’s support for passive euthanasia over active euthanasia despite the clear indications of which mo de is more effective and considerate is to protect/control doctors from using euthanasia unconventionally in practice.Where death is concerned, there is no moral justification for the phenomena because death is always perceived as a bad thing by everyone in society. The AMA’s distinction between passive and active euthanasia as a moral question does not apply to euthanasia because of the moral conditioning of society with regard to death. It would be more appropriate to apply ethical considerations on the matter of euthanasia.... This is more in line with the original intentions of allowing euthanasia to be an option in medical practice. Active euthanasia ensures that the patient does not suffer anymore as long as the decision is consensual and legal. The AMA’s postulation can be construed as an attempt to shield doctors from blame that might emerge from controversial ethical issues that result from cases where euthanasia is involved (Pence 242). Another explanation for AMA’s support for passive euthanasia over active euthanasia despite the clear indications of which mode is more effective and considerate, is to protect/control doctors from using euthanasia unconventionally in practice. Where death is concerned, there is no moral justification for the phenomena because death is always perceived as a bad thing by everyone in society. The AMA’s distinction of passive and active euthanasia as a moral question does not apply to euthanasia because of the moral conditioning of society with rega rd to death. It would be more appropriate to apply ethical considerations on the matter of euthanasia because the way it is executed heavily relies on ethics. The humanitarian principles that support euthanasia are based on the sound morals of alleviating pain and suffering (Pence 309). Thus, AMA’s assumption that passive euthanasia is more morally correct than active euthanasia; it is a selfish notion meant to serve and protect only one aspect of the two sided affair. The trolley problem presents a situation where one is faced with the difficult task of making a life and death decision between the life of five people or one person. Application of morals in this situation is not appropriate because there is no viable measure or gauge for